Site Tools


advanced-wireless

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
advanced-wireless [2022/03/09 15:44] – [AC-PHY Interference Mitigation] hogwildadvanced-wireless [2022/03/09 15:45] – [Advanced Wireless]-spelling hogwild
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Advanced Wireless ====== ====== Advanced Wireless ======
  
-The Advanced Wireless menu contains settings for advanced tuning of Wi-Fi interfaces. Changing these settings from the defaults is not recommended unless you are experienced with advanced Wi-Fi settings. All default settings in the dropdown menus on this page are noted with an asterisk (*). For basic Wi-Fi settings, see the wiki page for the [[network|Network]] menu. \\+The Advanced Wireless menu contains settings for advanced tuning of WiFi interfaces. Changing these settings from the defaults is not recommended unless you are experienced with advanced WiFi settings. All default settings in the dropdown menus on this page are noted with an asterisk (*). For basic WiFi settings, see the wiki page for the [[network|Network]] menu. \\
  \\  \\
 {{:pasted:20220309-082430.png}} \\ {{:pasted:20220309-082430.png}} \\
Line 398: Line 398:
  
 In theory, this modulation method makes it possible to transmit more bits per symbol, and thus increase data rates. In reality, most claims of big increases in transfer rates are likely exaggerated. QAM links are more susceptible to noise. As a result, Turbo QAM is generally only useful in very low-noise/interference wireless environments. Many people report it being effective on line-of-sight links of up to about 25 feet. Vendors claim the range with Turbo QAM may improve when beamforming is used. You may need to experiment to see what works best on your network. \\ In theory, this modulation method makes it possible to transmit more bits per symbol, and thus increase data rates. In reality, most claims of big increases in transfer rates are likely exaggerated. QAM links are more susceptible to noise. As a result, Turbo QAM is generally only useful in very low-noise/interference wireless environments. Many people report it being effective on line-of-sight links of up to about 25 feet. Vendors claim the range with Turbo QAM may improve when beamforming is used. You may need to experiment to see what works best on your network. \\
 + \\
  
 {{:pasted:20220309-083958.png}} \\ {{:pasted:20220309-083958.png}} \\
 + \\
  
 ==== Explicit beamforming ==== ==== Explicit beamforming ====
advanced-wireless.txt · Last modified: 2024/03/02 18:01 by hogwild